Comparison
OPC vs Private Limited vs Proprietorship
The solo-founder version of this decision. Here's how the three compare when there's no co-founder in the picture.
| Proprietorship | LLP | Private Limited | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Liability protection | None — you and the business are legally the same. | Yes — limited to your investment in the company. | Yes — same protection as OPC, with room for more shareholders. |
| Compliance burden | Lowest — minimal ongoing filings. | Moderate — lighter than a Private Limited Company, but real annual filings. | Highest — board meetings, ROC filings, audits past a threshold. |
| Raising funding | Not realistic. | Limited — must convert to Pvt Ltd once thresholds are crossed, or to raise equity. | Standard — the structure investors expect. |
| Cost & time to set up | Fastest, cheapest. | Moderate. | Highest, though still fast in practice. |
| Best for | Solo founders testing an idea with genuinely low risk. | Solo founders wanting real liability protection without full company compliance yet. | Solo founders who already know they'll raise funding or add shareholders. |
Choose Proprietorship if
You're solo, the risk is genuinely low, and you want the fastest, simplest way to start invoicing.
Choose OPC if
You're solo but want real liability protection now, without bringing on a co-founder just to incorporate.
Choose Private Limited if
You're solo today but already know you'll raise funding or bring on shareholders soon — incorporating directly saves a conversion step.